SOCIOLOGY AND TEACHER EVALUATION
Although technical questions of teacher evaluation are the
most frequently addressed by researchers, still other concerns
need to be examined. The most technically excellent teacher evaluation
system can be installed in a school district, but be doomed to
failure if the sociological dynamics are not addressed. Sociological
problems concern the effects of the larger social structure (e.g.,
expectations, norms, power) on the behavior of individuals and
subgroups within that structure (Goodman, 1992; Homans, 1950,
1961; Larsen, 1962; Parsons, 1937, 1964). Sociological dynamics
often describe the real world fate of teacher evaluation programs
better than a systems analysis flow chart, theoretical formulations
about effective teaching behavior or duties, or exhortations to
increased professional behavior. Educational sociologists, such
as Cusick (1973), Jackson (1968), Lortie (1975), and Johnson (1990),
have shown how workplace culture powerfully shapes educational
and evaluation practice. Sociological interventions in teacher
evaluation largely determine whether the organizational structure
elicits compliance and support for the technical procedures, or
actions contrary to the goals of the organization and participant
efforts to defeat the evaluation program itself. Sociological
perspectives are under represented in most research and development
in teacher evaluation.
Selected Sociological Constructs Having Implications and Applications
for School Teacher Evaluation
| Alienation | Control | Expectation | Norm |
| Anomie | Culture | Function | Power |
| Approval | Emergent | Gemeinschaft/ | Relationship |
| Author/Pawn | phenomenon | Gesellschaft | Reward |
| Authoritative | Endemic | Information | Role |
| reassurance | uncertainty | Influence | Sanction |
| Authority | Energy | Innovation | Sentiment |
| Charisma | Entrepreneurship | Investment | Status |
| Coercion | Equilibrium | Justice | Symbol |
| Contract | Exchange | Leadership | Value |